Mark Oestreicher has gone on trips with Adventures In Missions for years. Most recently he has been working with AIM in Haiti and he recently wrote this post on the work he is doing with AIM. He allowed us to re-post it. The original article can be here.
I think I miscalculated something. Please hear me on this: what I’m
about to explain is not an attempt to guilt anyone or manipulate. I
thought about how I should write about this, and realized that my blog
isn’t about spin, and that I should just say what’s on my mind. So here
it is, my miscalculation…
I thought it would be super easy to raise $35,000 for AIM’s Church-to-church program. I think (and thought) it’s such a unique and
revolutionary approach to long-term help for Haiti. And I think (and
thought) people would be quickly “in” on helping finance that kind of
thing, particularly when the funds we were trying to generate are for
the express purpose of providing the salaries of a few Haitian church
leaders.
But, man, I miscalculated. so far, our efforts have brought in a
total of about $750 (plus a $3500 offering taken at my own church a week
ago), even though we’ve had tens of thousands of blog readers and radio
listeners hear about it. Some of our team think people in the US have
“Haiti fatigue”. That may be true; but I’ve been very pleased with the
response to the church partnership program in terms of interested
churches (this was the very successful part of our trip there this past
week). I can already tell that the
partnership my own church has formed will be transformational for
both churches. So, I’m not completely convinced it’s a “Haiti fatigue”
issue.
What I’m wondering is: Did we talk about it in the wrong way?
I was (finally) reading Half
the Sky: Turning Oppression into Opportunity for Women Worldwide on
the plane ride home sunday (iIbought the book on kindle back when it
came out, but my wife short-cut me on it, and it fell out of my ‘to
read’ cycle). The authors mentioned, at one point, research that shows
what people are more likely to give to: the research showed that people
will give to a real person who’s story moves them much more than they
will give to a program, even if the program is very promising in terms
of impacting the lives of hundreds or thousands. And it struck me:
we’d talked about the concept of church to church, and how it will bring
sustainable change in Haiti; but we’d failed to tell the stories of the
few church leaders we’re hiring in Haiti to run it.
Here’s my sense of Geftay and John: both of these guys will be key
leaders in the Haitian church over the next decade (or more). Both of
them are clear-minded leaders, but with humble hearts. They’re
value-driven, passionate and articulate, but they listen more than they
talk (a leadership trait I often lack). They understand suffering at a
deeper level than I ever will, and bring that compassionate leadership
to every interaction (whether with a Haitian or an American).
It wasn’t until we were halfway through our week there that i
realized that Geftay and John (and Samuel) are the three Haitian church
leaders we were trying to fund with this giving project. For me, the
whole thing moved from a great concept to a wonderful personal story.